According to the description of the book "The Designed World of Information", I am able to have an understanding of some things about your book. Here are three specific things I found.
First, you apply probability theory and statistical analysis to coincidences, making the case that the role of chance in such phenomena is unlikely . You write that you "show how to make simple calculations to estimate the chances that coincidences are not due to mere randomness" and show readers "how to prove that the coincidences in their lives have meaning, rather than being a 'fluke' of pure luck" . That is a unique approach. Most books on synchronicity rely on anecdote. You use mathematics.
Second, you connect synchronicity to the deepest questions in science and philosophy. You write that the book "uniquely connects the synchronicity phenomenon with the questions of the Universe's origin, biological evolution, quantum mechanics, elementary particles and with the incredible beauty of the laws of nature" . You argue that "everything we know about the Universe is fully compatible with the existence of God" . You are not writing a religious book. You are writing a book that argues from science to spirituality.
Third, you are a skeptic writing for skeptics. You write that you "wrote this book for skeptics" and that "there are many studies appealing to the spiritual beginning, faith in God, religion, to convince people of the existence of a primary reality affecting our lives. Here I apply a new concept based on statistics, which is closest to the scientific approach to understanding such phenomena" . That is a rare and credible position. Most authors on this subject are believers writing for believers. You are a scientist writing for the scientifically minded.
These three things tell me you are not a beginner. You are a scientist who has spent decades studying the fundamental nature of reality.
James Harrison (jamesharrison.leo.me [ ] gmail.com)
Ads help maintain this website.
Ads help maintain this website.